Thursday, January 11, 2007

Whose Govt. Is It Anyway??

This question popped into my mind today. I’ll tell you the reason but let me first ask you to guess the first answer that came to your mind: UPA’s, ministers’, bureaucrats’? Well I don’t think so I think it’s the Supreme Court’s govt.

Well this thing became evident and the extremely controversial debates judicial activism would be revived with increased fervor. In some landmark judgments today Supreme Court revoked the “sanctity” of 9th schedule, set stage for police reforms.

Definitely some of them are compelling examples of judicial activism although with a grain of salt. The Parliament is entitled to make laws by a vote of chose representatives of India but it seems that Supreme Court is out quashing them if they seem to be violating fundamental rights of any party thus granting it a level above Parliament. SC can hardly be said to be running a parallel govt.

This also makes the Indian Supreme Court the most powerful govt. as it has now powers to repeal any law (of course, which violates basic structure of Constitution) which is in the 9th schedule which was designed by Constitution as a safe area which so far could not be reviewed by the courts. Nearly every state has contributed to 9th Schedule by framing its own sets of labor laws, govt. contract policies and the most contentious TN’s reservation policy. So SC suddenly has a magic wand which if it wields may bring about a political, social and perhaps economic turmoil in the country

Now the grain of salt is here: How would it be received by the public at large. As far as the 9th Schedule is concerned, it may depend on case to case basis depending on the size of the parties affected in each law but the second would be welcomed by almost everyone. But I can safely assume that there won’t be much organized resistance from the aam junta, which clearly is indicative of the balance of democracy inclining away from the executive arm. Although the above two judgments are cases of judicial activism but the recent decisions (read Jessica Lal murder trial, upholding tainted MP’s expulsion, convicting bureaucrats’ for murders)of courts in taking govt at task have ignited in people high quantum of hope and respect for judiciary.

Just a week back Rajdeep Sardesai wrote about the same, equilibrium shifting against the govt Barkha Dutt puts a different angle on those sitting in judgment asking who would judge the judges!! Read more about 9th Schedule here.

P.S.: Update 1: Some different views but nonetheless a landmark decision accd to me.





Update 2: Probably above video is not loading... will fix it up asap

13 comments:

Cuckoo said...

Heyy tell me where my comment on your post 'weaker sex' gone ?? I had written a longggggggg comment there. ANd lolll acha hua I didn't take that tag.. Don't believe in resolutions..

This post ? Very thought provoking post. Will come later to comment...itna serious hai ki I have to be in right frame of mind to comment. :P Abhi tried but couldn't understand a word of Ninth schedule. :((

KT said...

hehe... well I think our thought pattern matches a little...

when I had posted "weaker sex" ... I did expect you to comment on that .. since you heart (write) out on such posts avidly....

anyways... put your comments anytime u wish ... and as far as 9th schedule is concerned.... I have given link to that right at the end.... but here it is again..

http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/jan/11indira.htm

Anonymous said...

Kamal,

I am not sure we are seeing judicial activism here in this case. This is just clarifying that the 9th schedule cannot be used to subvert Keshavananda Barathi.

KT said...

well I agree Courts have the power to decide disputes of "interpretation" of a rule or law and although it was decreed that basic structure of Constitution can't be changed thru any other law but this judgment leaves the discretion of interpreting the "basic structure" with the Courts all in the name of "interpretation"

although I admit its not judicial activism per se.

Anonymous said...

MOre than judicial activitism, it was the activism of the NGO, who came up and challeneged the law..
and regd the verdict, acc to me there are 2 points of constitution here - one is the fundamental right of citizens and second is the 9th schedule.. the SC deemed that first one was more important (it naturally is) and found that second was infringing on the first...hence the decision of an interference...
The law which the lawmakers of our country made for their illicit use.., had, as quite evident, become a means for carrying on some mindless activities - all under the umbrella of legality...
Regarding the SC becoming the baap of all and the ques of who will judge the judges - i believe, the junta of India is poised to become the judge of all in times to come.. and to carry on the judging activities, it picks up some one... In this case, we have put faith in judiciary against politicians.. when it becomes evident that the judiciary is going the politicians way, I believe there will be some one else which the masses will chose to go against the wrong - uns..

KT said...

@Sid: ah yes...I think I totally ignored the NGO here.... they definitely deserve kudos for this... well this verdict has been welcomed by many including me... especially 9th schedule too was misused by politicians just like reservation which shud have ended way back but was kept ignited by these politicians....

But what I mean to also say is that with this move 1) the courts have declared themselves above Parliament and in a way democracy as well 2) so are we to suppose that all the judgments will be as good, how would a verdict be struck down if it is unfairly passed by the courts, say a case against a member of legal fraternity... who would then judge the judges... are you suggesting a revolution ??? But I think the fulcrum of power will keep shifting to and fro b/w Parliament and Courts.....

Anonymous said...

see.. politicians carried with their wrong doings for long time.. now with people activism and not to forget media activism, justice has taken control of some things and hindered those wrong doings of the politicians, atleast to some extent..(the e.gs u have given)..
so in a way with people awakening we have started to move in some direction using one of the pillars of constitution as our weapon...
1. if like u r suggesting, justice system also becomes totally corrupt, it will take atleast some time for this to happen.. and in today's open and media savvy days, it is bit hard to happen too...
2. All the members of judiciary are well educated unlike politicians.. so we can expect something better out of them..
3. if this system also fails, then i hope and believe that a revolutions of similar kinds (like the one which is happening these days- yes i term it as a revolution only) will happen.... to prove that 'WE' are the power..

Anonymous said...

The weapon will also be there...what it will be - i don't know... but guess.. where there is a will.. there is a way

KT said...

Although no one will rate the entire judiciary as a pure and un corrupt body but still your terming this thing as revolution is justified.....

but as I said in my comment's last line... may be the fulcrum of power will keep shifting b/w Parliament and Courts and therein lies the beauty of democracy... one pillar "over"supporting the whole framework

KT said...

Although no one will rate the entire judiciary as a pure and un corrupt body but still your terming this thing as revolution is justified.....

but as I said in my comment's last line... may be the fulcrum of power will keep shifting b/w Parliament and Courts and therein lies the beauty of democracy... one pillar "over"supporting the whole framework

SiD said...

yes.. nothing is corruption free but still its much better...
and acc to me it may not be the case that these two will only be there on the 2 ends of see saw.. we may see a triangle formed..some 3rd power emerging.. although hypothetical ryt now.. but who knows!!!

Cuckoo said...

Wow ! What a discussion. Hey guys, I have read all the comments here. I don't think I can contribute much here.Good going. Please carry on ! :))

I'll come and read as and when I get time.

:)))))

KT said...

@sid: sure there may be... rather how we all wish there is one.. so that if any two links are down the other may take corrective action. I just hope things just get better with new CJI being sworn in today.
May we all see much more action than we already have.

@cuckoo: well thnx 4 dropping by... well I don't think any of the comments come from a very experienced sociologist (or someone equivalent) .. they are just raw comments.. you may sure drop in your own raw views as well.. :):)